|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
What is more
appropriate than monitoring is international cooperation in
providing technical assistance to democracies such as Sri Lanka,
that are grappling with terrorism, said Sri Lankan Ambassador in
Washington Bernard Goonetilleke in a letter to Rep. Rush Holt
who recently wrote to President Bush calling upon the
administration to launch a diplomatic initiative to bring peace
to Sri Lanka. You would recall that I met with you on February 1. 2007, following your initial letter to President Bush, and updated you on the situation in Sri Lanka. My present letter to you specifically intends to shed light on the backdrop of the events you speak of in your letter. For instance, what led to the increase of displaced persons in the east since June 2006 was the resumption of armed hostilities by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), also known as Tamil Tigers, since December 2005. to fulfil its leader's goal of achieving a mono-ethnic separate state for Sri Lankan Tamils in the north and the east, during 2006. To this end, the LTTE, having previously provoked the government by attacking the armed forces, by attempting to assassinate the army commander employing a female suicide bomber, and subsequently assassinated the third senior most officer of the Sri Lanka Army and carried out several terrorist attacks against civilians during the first half of the year. Thereafter, they attacked the strategic port of Trincomalee, and attempted to capture the Jaffna peninsula, home to over 600,000 Sri Lankan Tamils. The Tamil Tigers then proceeded to disrupt the movement of relief supplies by sea to the civilians in the peninsula, even refusing to allow safe passage to relief vessels under the protection of the ICRC, the Sri Lanka Monitoring Mission (SLMM) or the UN. This was done to bring international pressure on the government by creating a humanitarian situation. Having tolerated these provocations and acts of terrorism in the east and the north of the island for many months. in June 2006, the government was initially compelled to respond militarily to individual provocations. and later to free the civilian population from the grip of the LTTE and restore normalcy in the east. The armed conflict. which ensued following the cutting off of water supply to Mavil Aru in the east by the Tamil Tigers in June 2006, also led to civilians being displaced in the east. However, the estimated number of displaced people in the east was around 200,000. and not 290,000. as some agencies claim. The security forces cleared most of the Eastern Province of LTTE control by January 2007. The government's next move was to resettle the displaced civilians in their homes, which was partially completed with the assistance of relevant government agencies. The foreign diplomatic missions in Sri Lanka, international humanitarian agencies. and foreign and local NGOs. It was when such a delegation comprising ambassadors from the US, Germany, France, the EU and Japan, as well as the Canadian High Commissioner and UN and Sri Lanka government officials visited Batticaloa on February 27. 2007. to assess the rehabilitation needs of the area, that the LTTE attacked them with mortar and artillery fire. injuring the Italian Ambassador. At this point, you may be pleased to learn that the government has since succeeded in resettling over 95,000 persons in the East by June 22, 2007 and is taking steps to resettle the remaining displaced population. As you would appreciate, resettlement of displaced civilians in their homes and helping them to resume their disrupted livelihoods is a gigantic task that requires considerable resources, and the government is determined to bring relief to them, whose lives were violently disrupted by the LTTE for nearly three decades. The government recognizes that economic development is vital to restore normalcy to the lives of resettled civilians and to bring back hope to the lives of marginalized youth, so they would be weaned away from violence. To this end, the government plans to develop the infrastructure in the conflict-affected areas - to upgrade the road network and the railway, to extend the supply of electricity, to enhance health services and to' improve the public school system. Your letter also refers to the need for international monitoring of the human rights situation in the island. Here I would like to point out that Sri Lanka is party to 16 international human rights conventions under some of which international scrutiny is required. As in similar situations elsewhere in the world, armed conflicts of this nature regrettably lead to violations of human rights. With a view to addressing this issue. the government established a Commission of Inquiry (COI) to function under international observation. Furthermore, when credible evidence is available, as in the case of Thandikulam killings in November 2006, the government has taken steps to serve Indictments on army and police personnel. This is not an isolated action. For example, 10 and 07 indictments were served against security forces and police personnel In 2006 and 2007 respectively. Meanwhile, departmental disciplinary action was taken against 06 armed forces personnel in 2006 and 20 and 06 personnel by the Police Special Interrogation Unite (SIU) and the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) during the same period. Against this
backdrop, what is more appropriate than monitoring is
International cooperation in providing technical assistance to
democracies such as Sri Lanka, that are grappling with terrorism
to train their armed forces to observe human rights and
humanitarian laws, upgrade law enforcement capacity to conduct
investigations and carry out prosecutions effectively. In the
case of Sri Lanka, Colombo has requested such assistance from
friendly countries, including the US , and I hope our request
will be favorably considered. I am heartened by your focus on the need for disrupting financing of the LTTE. It is widely acknowledged that fund raising by the Tamil Tigers and its front organizations Internationally continues to fuel the armed conflict and supports acts of terrorism in Sri Lanka. It is also widely accepted that unless all channels of funds are choked and their ability to procure weapons internationally is cut off, there will be no incentive for the LTTE to return to the negotiating table from which they unilaterally withdraw in April 2003. Against this backdrop, we commend the measures taken by the U.S. administration to block efforts made by the LTTE to raise funds and procure weapons nationally and internationally. We are encouraged by the support of friendly countries in our effort to rebuild our nation that has suffered so much through the ravages of almost thirty years of terrorism. As we continue with our task of reconstruction and rehabilitation of the conflict-ridden areas, and promote and protect human rights, we look forward to even greater support from our friends around the world. I would be
pleased to provide further information and clarification on Sri
Lanka's situation should you require any.
|
|