|
The recent Amnesty International (AI) report titled
"Sri Lanka-Silencing Dissent" fails to acknowledge
the many positive steps taken by GOSL to promote
freedom of expression which is also enshrined in the
Constitution. It fails to acknowledge any positive
steps taken by the Government of Sri Lanka to
enhance protection in an environment of combating
terrorism and shadowy killers”, states the Ministry
of Foreign Affairs in a response to AI’s
observations. It says the AI report on alleged
threats to media and media freedom is totally
misplaced - a contradiction between the title
‘silencing dissent' and Government's sustained
policy of open and constructive engagement with the
international community and the international human
rights mechanisms.
Here is the text of the Foreign Ministry
response:
The attention of the Government of Sri Lanka has
been drawn to a recent report issued by the Amnesty
International entitled "Sri Lanka-Silencing Dissent"
on alleged threats to media and media freedom. The
Report is totally misplaced - a contradiction
between the title ‘silencing dissent' and
Government's sustained policy of open and
constructive engagement with the international
community and the international human rights
mechanisms.
In 2007 the Government of Sri Lanka extended
invitations to the UN High Commissioner for Human
Rights, UN Under Secretary General for Humanitarian
Affairs, the Special Representative of the UN
Secretary General on the human rights of internally
displaced persons, the Special Rapporteur on
Torture, and in early 2008, to a delegation from the
Inter Parliamentary Union and Ms Angela Kane, the UN
Assistant Secretary General for Political Affairs.
In keeping with its voluntary pledge in 2006, Sri
Lanka has already extended an invitation to the UN
Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression to visit
the country. A look at some of the weekend
newspapers would prove the level of freedom enjoyed
by the press in Sri Lanka to criticize anyone, in
particular senior government figures.
The Amnesty International report fails to
acknowledge the many positive steps taken by GOSL to
promote freedom of expression which is also
enshrined in the Constitution. It fails to
acknowledge any positive steps taken by the
Government of Sri Lanka to enhance protection in an
environment of combating terrorism and shadowy
killers, (the LTTE recently branded as one of the
worst such groups in the world); the re-issuing of
Presidential guidelines on arrest, the setting up of
Independent Commissions of Inquiry, the crackdown by
the police which has resulted in a decrease of
allegations of abductions and disappearances, as
well as invitations extended to special procedures
mandate holders to visit Sri Lanka and present easy
to implement recommendations to enhance protection.
The listing below of media houses and radio/TV
stations will indicate the current status of freedom
of information in the country. All these electronic
media outlets and stations function independently,
mainly under private ownership and with no
interference from the Government. There are only 4
Government owned outlets among them.
14 media outlets – Radio/TV
2 Sinhala Language stations
04 Tamil Language stations
06 English Language stations
03 Regional Sinhala Language stations
01 Regional Tamil Language stations
03 Sinhala Language Community radio stations
Regarding security, any individual is provided
security on the basis of a threat assessment. Any
individual who is not satisfied may apply for
redress to the Supreme Court, which has recently
pronounced in favour of certain applications and
directed the responsible authorities to provide
enhanced security.
While affirming the commitment of the Government
of Sri Lanka to uphold media freedom, the Government
rejects attempts to denigrate national institutions
in the eyes of the international community to
achieve narrow politically motivated objectives.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Colombo.
7 March 2008
|