|
|
|
Monday, March 17, 2008 - 04.50 GMT |
|
|
Back |
Ambassador says why Sri Lanka objects to
larger OHCHR presence |
|
|
|
|
Dr. Dayan Jayatilleka, Ambassador/Permanent
Representative of Sri Lanka to the UN, Geneva told a
panel discussion titled `War, Peace and Human
Rights: Sri Lanka after the Eastern Elections', was
held today (Friday, March 14th) on the sidelines of
the Seventh Session of the Human Rights Council in
Geneva explained Sri Lanka's current disinclination
to accede to the demand for a large scale standing
presence of the OHCHR.
He gave three reasons for it. They are:
“Firstly he explained that Sri Lanka was not an
emerging democracy recently liberated from a one
party democracy or military dictatorship. . Sri
Lanka has had parliamentary democracy since 1931 and
independence since 1948 and therefore had
well-developed national institutions.
“Secondly, he said that several counties which had
field offices of the OHCHR advised Sri Lanka in
discussions with the Minister of Human Rights and
our delegation, that given their experience, and Sri
Lanka's situation, the most effective solution for
Sri Lanka is to strengthen our national
institutions.
“Thirdly he said that many countries within the
Human Rights Council had called for better regional
representation and transparency of the OHCHR.”
Once this has been achieved, Sri Lanka may be able
to consider a new equation with the Office, but
until then certain questions did not arise, he
added.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
 |
^ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|