Sri Lanka Permanent Mission to the UN in
Geneva yesterday contradicted several
inaccuracies and distortions contained in a
report in the London Daily Express to the
effect that Sri Lanka Had called for the
abolition of the British monarchy.
"It is a double distortion to assert that
Sri Lanka insisted on the inclusion of the
recommendation of the abolition of the
monarchy in the UN report, firstly because,
no such recommendation was made, secondly
because the preparation and production of
the report is entirely a matter for the
group of three randomly chosen states,
termed the 'troika' together with the state
under review, in this case the UK. Sri Lanka
was not a member of the 'troika'," Permanent
Mission said in a statement.Full text
of the statement
The Permanent Mission of Sri Lanka to the
United Nations in Geneva wishes to
contradict several inaccuracies and
distortions contained in a report in the
London Daily Express, which seems to have
been echoed by certain other news
organizations, to the effect that Sri Lanka
called for the abolition of the British
monarchy. There was no such call, not by Sri
Lanka and not by the UN Human Rights
Council. Indeed the quote cited in the Daily
Express does not include such a call. It
recommends only that the UK 'consider' the
holding of a referendum on the desirability
or otherwise of a written constitution,
preferably republican, with a bill of
rights. The Daily Express has omitted the
reference to a bill of rights.
The entire matter is regarded as subject
to the sovereign decision of the British
people, and the recommendation is that the
UK considers the ascertainment of their
wishes by means of a referendum. It contains
the further qualifier of 'the desirability
or otherwise'.
It is a double distortion to assert that Sri
Lanka insisted on the inclusion of the
recommendation of the abolition of the
monarchy in the UN report, firstly because,
as stated above, no such recommendation was
made, secondly because the preparation and
production of the report is entirely a
matter for the group of three randomly
chosen states, termed the 'troika' together
with the state under review, in this case
the UK. Sri Lanka was not a member of the
'troika'.
It was entirely the prerogative of the state
under review, the UK , to raise a point of
order, or object to the listing of any
recommendation it chose to reject, and
thereby limit its mention to the summary of
proceedings in the narrative portion of the
text. The state under review also has the
further option of engaging through the
troika with any other state which had made
recommendations to negotiate their
modification.
The Universal Periodic Review (UPR)
process and mechanism entail recommendations
which are constructively intended. In the
UPR process the UK too has made many
recommendations about other countries, which
those countries have dealt with in different
ways.
|