This latest campaign in Tamil Nadu
masterminded by a desperate LTTE must not be
allowed to undermine the sound policy
decision upheld by successive Indian
governments since 1991 to stay out of Sri
Lanka’s internal affairs, says Malini
Parthasarathy in an article published in The
Hindu on October 14.
"If New Delhi were to express its
disapproval, even implicitly, of Sri Lanka’s
sovereign right to recapture its own
national territory from the LTTE, it would
weaken the moral authority of India’s own
actions in regard to its struggle against
terrorism and the separatist agitation in
Kashmir," she adds.
Noting that there is indeed a broad-based
political consensus behind the Indian state
when it takes strong steps to root out
terrorism, she says it is therefore all the
more incongruous that the political parties
in Tamil Nadu, including the ruling DMK and
its principal challenger the AIADMK have
decided to work themselves into a frenzy
over the alleged violation of the “human
rights” of the Sri Lankan Tamils in the
context of the military action against the
LTTE.
"Since the 1990s, New Delhi’s policy has
been to acknowledge the terrorist character
of the LTTE and the imperative of a military
confrontation with that organisation, while
continuing to offer moral encouragement to
Colombo to find a political solution that
would provide a framework to empower the
Tamil community," she comments.
With the ruthless elimination of every
credible interlocutor in the Tamil community
by the LTTE which insisted that it was the
sole representative of the Sri Lankan
Tamils, the space for a political solution
has narrowed, she notes adding that the
Thirteenth Amendment to the Sri Lankan
Constitution which was a consequence of the
Indo-Sri Lankan Agreement of 1987,
envisaging devolution of power to provincial
councils has become a touchstone for the
resolution of the ethnic conflict.
The text of the article:
The dangers of Tamil chauvinism
Malini Parthasarathy
Time appears to have stood still for most
Tamil Nadu’s politicians who seem completely
insulated from the complex ground realities
that mark India’s new political landscape.
India’s political establishment and civil
society are anxiously grappling with the
enormity of the horrific new threat to
Indian society — terrorism — fast becoming
an everyday reality on the streets. But
oddly enough, seemingly oblivious of the
contradiction, political parties in Tamil
Nadu, led by the MDMK and the PMK, have
recently plunged into high-pitched activity
aimed at garnering support for the LTTE, a
deadly terrorist organisation.
These parties have launched a campaign in
the State ostensibly to express solidarity
with the Sri Lankan Tamils trapped in the
war zone in northern Sri Lanka but the
timing of this campaign which appears to
have materialised overnight, is a dead
giveaway. The Sri Lankan army, just two
kilometres away from the LTTE’s
administrative capital, Kilinochchi, has
successfully encircled the Tigers and their
leader who are virtually trapped in their
bunkers. For the first time in years, the
Sri Lankan government appears to be on the
brink of a major success in its battle with
terrorism. There is now the very real
prospect of the capture of the elusive LTTE
chief, Velupillai Prabakaran, who is behind
the assassination of a former Prime Minister
of India, Rajiv Gandhi.
Tamil Nadu’s politicians clearly have
different standards for India and for Sri
Lanka. It would appear that they accept that
battling terrorism in India and saving
Kashmir from Islamist jihadis are important
national tasks but not so in Sri Lanka which
has been menaced for more than two decades
by the LTTE. It was the LTTE which pioneered
terrorism in South Asia and produced two
generations of suicide bombers who have
claimed numerous high-profile victims. For
far too long have the legitimate aspirations
of the Sri Lankan Tamils been held hostage
to the hegemonic ambitions of the LTTE chief
Prabakaran who has consistently sabotaged
all attempts to find political solutions to
the ethnic conflict.
When Pakistani generals and Islamist
militants characterise the separatist
uprising in Kashmir as a “freedom struggle,”
the collective Indian national consciousness
is understandably outraged. Politicians in
India are rarely exercised over concerns
that the human rights of innocent citizens
are often trampled upon in police action
against terrorists or their perceived
accomplices. There is indeed a broad-based
political consensus behind the Indian state
when it takes strong steps to root out
terrorism.
It is therefore all the more incongruous
that the political parties in Tamil Nadu,
including the ruling DMK and its principal
challenger the AIADMK have decided to work
themselves into a frenzy over the alleged
violation of the “human rights” of the Sri
Lankan Tamils in the context of the military
action against the LTTE. Evidently, the game
plan of the LTTE and its supporters is to
rally Tamil chauvinist sentiment and
translate that into pressure on New Delhi to
signal its disapproval to Colombo, thereby
weakening its moral authority in the eyes of
the Sri Lankan Tamil community.
There is a strong sense of déjŔ vu,
listening to the rhetoric and speeches of
leaders in Tamil Nadu, whose understanding
of the Sri Lankan political situation is
mired in a time-warp, their images of the
ethnic conflict drawing primarily from
scenes of two decades ago, particularly the
flashpoint of 1983, when the Wellikada
prison massacre highlighted dramatically the
plight of the Sri Lankan Tamil community and
brought thousands of refugees to Indian
shores. But after the assassination of Rajiv
Gandhi, the Indian national psyche recoiled
from a continued engagement with the Sri
Lankan ethnic crisis.
Since the 1990s, New Delhi’s policy has been
to acknowledge the terrorist character of
the LTTE and the imperative of a military
confrontation with that organisation, while
continuing to offer moral encouragement to
Colombo to find a political solution that
would provide a framework to empower the
Tamil community. Meanwhile, India made clear
its utter repugnance for the LTTE by banning
it not just because it was involved in the
murder of Rajiv Gandhi but because it viewed
the LTTE as a terrorist movement that would
continuously strive to stimulate the
secessionist sentiment in Tamil Nadu as long
as Sri Lanka continued to have ethnic
strife.
The situation in Sri Lanka itself has
undergone profound changes since the 1980s,
when it was easier to conceptualise purely
political solutions and rule out military
responses to the violent dimensions of the
conflict. At that point in time, it was
indeed possible to sideline the militant
groups of Sri Lankan Tamil politics by
engaging the political interlocutors in the
Tamil community such as the urbane leaders
of the TULF, notably Appapillai
Amirthalingam, who recognised the key to
political empowerment lay in the democratic
process. But with the ruthless elimination
of every credible interlocutor in the Tamil
community by the LTTE which insisted that it
was the sole representative of the Sri
Lankan Tamils, the space for a political
solution has narrowed over the years,
rendering null and void the several
exercises seeking a devolution of power to
the Tamil community.
Yet the Thirteenth Amendment to the Sri
Lankan Constitution which was a consequence
of the Indo-Sri Lankan Agreement of 1987,
envisaging devolution of power to provincial
councils has become a touchstone for the
resolution of the ethnic conflict. The Sri
Lankan President, Mahinda Rajapaksa, has
made it clear that he remains committed to a
political solution of this sort. In a
meeting with the All Party Representative
Conference (APRC) last Saturday, Mr.
Rajapaksa emphasised that it was the duty of
the Sri Lankan state “to ensure to the Tamil
people of the North the same democratic
rights as enjoyed by the people in all parts
of the country.” He also took care to
explain that the military action against the
LTTE was against terrorism and not against
the Tamil community.
The Sri Lankan President has acquired
unprecedented political space for his
military campaign against the LTTE. Several
factors including the rebellion of the
powerful LTTE commander Karuna and the fact
that there is now in place an elected
provincial council in the Eastern Province
have rendered irrelevant many of the points
in the earlier Sri Lankan Tamil political
platform. That there is a credible and
workable political solution now in sight has
made it easier for Colombo to launch
military operations against the LTTE. It is
indeed the sovereign right of Sri Lanka as
it is of India to eliminate any terrorist
organisation that poses a fundamental threat
to its survival as a nation.
The parties in Tamil Nadu which have strong
ties to the LTTE such as the MDMK and the
PMK are in the forefront of this new
campaign which has sprung to life overnight
after decades of silence. Their rhetoric is
dated and wearily familiar. The MDMK’s Vaiko,
brimming with moral indignation, has lashed
out at the Centre for allegedly sending
military assistance to Sri Lanka which was
“unleashing a genocidal attack on the Tamil
race”. Likewise the PMK’s leader S. Ramadoss
has alleged that “the situation on the
island threatens to eliminate the entire
Tamil race”.
That the LTTE’s shadow lurks behind this new
campaign is evident in the demand of Dr.
Ramadoss that the Union government recognise
the “Eelam Tamils struggle for their
rights.” There is also an implied acceptance
of the LTTE’s claim to be the only authentic
representative of the Sri Lankan Tamils in
the declaration of Dr. Ramadoss that the
LTTE is “acting as a fortress for ethnic
Tamils.”
As the LTTE has presumably calculated, this
binge of competitive chauvinism has
compelled Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi to
up the ante on this issue, adding for good
measure, his own dramatic assertion that
unless the Centre cooperates in stopping the
attacks on the Sri Lankan Tamils, not only
would the Sri Lankan Tamils perish but so
also would the “Tamils in Tamil Nadu.” The
strategic design behind the campaign to
“express solidarity” with the Sri Lankan
Tamils that is now under way in Tamil Nadu
should not be underestimated.
For the last decade or so, New Delhi has
successfully resisted the various attempts
made by the LTTE and its supporters in Tamil
Nadu to force it to intervene in the Sri
Lankan ethnic crisis. If New Delhi were to
express its disapproval, even implicitly, of
Sri Lanka’s sovereign right to recapture its
own national territory from the LTTE, it
would weaken the moral authority of India’s
own actions in regard to its struggle
against terrorism and the separatist
agitation in Kashmir. This latest campaign
in Tamil Nadu masterminded by a desperate
LTTE must not be allowed to undermine the
sound policy decision upheld by successive
Indian governments since 1991 to stay out of
Sri Lanka’s internal affairs.
Courtesy: The Hindu
|