|
The LTTE has a track record of announcing
ceasefires when they
are militarily weakened and are in need of
fresh of supply of arms and ammunition, and
need to re-group and recruit fighters. The
LTTE's call for a ceasefire is not sincere,
especially in view of the fact that once
again this call comes when they have been
drastically weakened by the forces. It is
necessary to be realistic when dealing with
a terrorist force like LTTE said President
Mahinda Rajapaksa in an interview to New
Indian Express on December 18.
"The LTTE has been known to use innocent
civilians as human shields and is preventing
them from moving into safer areas especially
using the safe corridors to the South
provided by the government. Perhaps the
political leaders who have been expressing
concern over the safety of civilians in the
conflict areas could coax the LTTE to allow
the civilians to move towards the safe
corridors," he said.
He said: “There is error in thinking that
there is need to wean the people away from
the LTTE. There is nothing to show that they
are fully committed to the LTTE or nurtured
by it.”
President Rajapaksa termed the fall of
Kilinochchi is a step towards restoring
democracy to the people of that area where
the people have been subjected to the
brutalities of the LTTE.
Excerpts from the interview:
Q: Thank you for this opportunity to
meet you Mr President, despite your very
busy schedule. Let me begin with a most
interesting aspect of current developments.
You have mentioned that there can be no
military solution to the ethnic problem in
Sri Lanka. How do you propose to solve this
problem?
A: You are right in quoting me. I
firmly believe that there is no military
solution to the current conflict in Sri
Lanka. I have been consistent in maintaining
this position. While we are militarily
tackling the terrorists, we are keen to
pursue a political solution for the people
of Sri Lanka. I would like to reiterate our
firm commitment to a negotiated political
solution within an undivided Sri Lanka,
taking into account the aspirations of all
the communities, including the Tamils. As an
extension to the political process that is
currently underway through the All Party
Representative Committee (APRC) we have also
now invited the Tamil National Alliance (TNA)
to join this process and we welcome their
suggestions and proposals to achieve
fairness to all within an undivided country.
While I am awaiting the final proposal from
the APRC, I wish to state that we are in the
process of implementing the interim proposal
submitted to me by the APRC, based on which
the elections in the Eastern Province were
held, after its liberation from the clutches
of terror, and a Tamil chief minister was
elected to office. We are now in the process
of devolving more powers to the Eastern
Province and as a part of this process a DIG
of Police from the Tamil community has been
appointed to the province. We are hopeful of
replicating this success in the East in the
Northern Province as well.
We hear reports that the arrangement with
Karuna and Pillaiyan are not really working
as well as they should…
Having followed Sri Lankan affairs and the
conflict in the North and East, you must be
aware that both chief minister
Chandrakanthan (Pillaiyan) and Member of
Parliament Mr Muralitharan (Karuna) spent
many years fighting the government while
they were members of the LTTE. The fact that
they have renounced violence and chosen the
democratic path to the extent of becoming
part of the electoral process and government
is an achievement by itself. Differences of
opinion between two leaders of the same
party are common in democracy; you will see
it in most democratic parties, and I hope
that they will sort out these differences in
the better and larger interests of the
people they represent.
Q: There is a perception in Tamil
Nadu that the civilian population is being
killed collaterally or otherwise in the
military campaign. How do you respond?
A: Let me be very clear, this is a
wholly wrong perception. I have consistently
maintained that our military actions are
strictly directed at the LTTE terrorists and
not against the Tamil people. I have given
strict instructions to the forces to ensure
that there should not be any civilian
casualties; and the forces have also
exercised maximum caution on this aspect.
However, I acknowledge that due to the
nature of the conflict there has been damage
to civilian properties which will be rebuilt
and normal life restored no sooner the area
is freed from the terrorists, as in the case
of the Eastern Province where the government
is in the process of spending $ 1.8 billion
for development during the next three years.
However, the LTTE has been known to use
innocent civilians as human shields and is
preventing them from moving into safer areas
especially using the safe corridor to the
South provided by the military and
government.
Perhaps the political leaders who have been
expressing concern over the safety of
civilians in the conflict areas could coax
the LTTE to allow the civilians to move
towards the safe corridor.
Q: There is concern in Tamil Nadu
that the relief materials are not
sufficiently provided in the conflict areas.
What has been done to address this?
A: It is difficult to address the
concerns of anybody that are not based on
fact. The total number of Internally
Displaced Persons (IDPs) mentioned in the
media is factually exaggerated.
According to available statistics, the
number of IDPs is approximately around one
lakh. However, taking into account the
hardships of the people living in
Kilinochchi and Mullaitivu districts and
part of the Vavuniya district, I have
ordered that relief items be provided to all
the civilians of those areas free of charge,
knowing very well that a portion of the food
items will be taken by the LTTE.
From September this year to date we have
dispatched 11,058 tonnes of food and 598
tonnes of non-food items to the Kilinochchi
and Mullaitivu districts. This is apart from
4,370 food items distributed by the World
Food Programme during the same period. These
are easily verifiable facts and figures to
those genuinely interested. We also
appreciate the gesture by the Indian
government of sending relief items sent by
the people of Tamil Nadu, all of which have
now been distributed among the civilians in
the conflict areas. Hence, there is no
shortage of food and other essential
provisions in the conflict areas. There is a
need for more shelter and we are in the
process of addressing this.
Q: On the influx of refugees to Tamil
Nadu, do you think this could be a problem?
A: I am not aware of any such influx
today. Let me put this in perspective.
During the liberation of the Eastern
Province last year we had 1,70,000 IDPs and
at present there are about 1,00,000 IDPs in
the North. According to statistics complied
by the Tamil Nadu government, the total
number of refugee arrivals from Sri Lanka
since January 2006 is only 22,800. Out of
this 22,800 about 5,429 have voluntarily
returned to Sri Lanka. This illustrates that
there is no severe influx of refugees into
Tamil Nadu. I understand that following the
clearance of the Eastern Province a number
of refugees from the Eastern Province who
are in Tamil Nadu are now willing to return.
My government is prepared to extend all
possible assistance for such returnees. I
trust this answers your question adequately.
Q: You have been the Minister of
Fisheries. Can you give me a candid
assessment of how much of fishing goes on in
your waters by boats from Tamil Nadu on a
daily basis?
A: According to the information from
the Navy, on an average about 500 fishing
vessels enter Sri Lankan waters daily and
engage in fishing. The entry of fishing
craft from Tamil Nadu to Sri Lankan waters
has been going on for some time, as you
suggested from the time I was Minister of
Fisheries, too. This is a matter that has to
be resolved in a spirit of friendship by two
neighbours.
Q: What about the element of
smuggling by boats from Tamil Nadu? How
serious is that concern? How widespread do
you think that practice is?
A: The movement of smugglers and
other illegal entities in the sea is
certainly a threat to any country’s
sovereignty and security.
Sri Lanka takes serious note of this,
especially as they could be, and most likely
are linked to terrorism that we are
committed to eradicate.
Q: Why do you think all this happens
even though the navies of the two countries
are ostensibly doing coordinated patrolling?
A: The Sri Lanka Navy has taken all
steps to prevent such activities. It is also
a well-known fact that there is a nexus
existing between the smugglers and the LTTE
and perhaps even other terrorist
organisations. I believe the answer is more
concerted and coordinated action.
There are welcome signs that India is also
taking note of the dangers to its own
coastal security today.
The LTTE is obviously ready for ceasefire.
The Tamil Nadu chief minister has backed the
call. Yet you dismissed the suggestion out
of hand. Why?
One must understand the background to the
LTTE’s call for a ceasefire. The LTTE has a
track record of announcing ceasefires when
they are militarily weakened and are in need
of fresh of supply of arms and ammunition,
and need to re-group and recruit fighters.
After I assumed the presidency in November
2005, the LTTE leader in his Hero’s Day
speech described me as a ‘pragmatic’ leader
and he stated he would give my government
one year’s time to find a solution to the
ethnic issue.
However, he never gave me the smallest
opportunity to demonstrate my pragmatism as
he launched attacks on the armed forces
followed by terrorist acts against innocent
civilians within two weeks of his speech.
Despite these provocations I was committed
to the ceasefire agreement signed by former
Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe in 2002,
which had many flaws that favoured the LTTE.
Just look at the record of that ceasefire.
It was monitored by the Sri Lanka Monitoring
Mission which comprised Nordic countries,
which conclusively reported that the LTTE
had violated the ceasefire agreement 3,850
times, mostly serious violations, while the
violations by the security forces was only
351 times, which were mainly instances of
harassment.
Therefore, based on this and our other past
experiences of the behaviour of the LTTE in
this regard, we don’t think the LTTE is
sincere in its call for a ceasefire,
especially in view of the fact that once
again this new call comes when they have
been drastically weakened by the forces. It
is necessary to be realistic when dealing
with a terrorist force as the LTTE.
Q: What are the conditions that
require to be met before you declare a
military victory? Does it end with
Kilinochchi?
A: As I have already stated I am not
for a military solution though it has become
necessary to use force that is rightly
available to the State and the
democratically elected government, to
curtail terrorism in order to bring
democracy to the people. Therefore, the fall
of Kilinochchi will only be a step towards
restoring democracy to the people of that
area where the people have been subjected to
the brutalities of the LTTE. Far from being
a military victory, it will be the beginning
of the restoration of democratic freedoms.
That will be the real victory.
Q: How soon do you see it happening?
A: I don’t wish to give a time frame
though it is my earnest hope that it will be
in the near future. You must be able to
judge it from the reports you receive.
The locals and refugees in Kilinochchi and
Mullaitivu comprise, I believe, roughly four
lakh. Given this ground reality, is there a
military way to address this dense
population scenario? How do you propose to
wean away people from the LTTE?
The figures you give are questionable. But I
will not go into that. There is an error in
the thinking that there is a need to wean
the people away from the LTTE. There is
nothing to show that they are fully
committed to the LTTE, or are nurtured by
it, although a small misled minority, mainly
indoctrinated by terrorism and given false
hopes may still be with it.
The LTTE has at no time been the genuine
representative of the Tamil people. We know
that the Tamil people left in Kilinochchi
and Mullaitivu are held there in thrall of
the LTTE’s arms. Once that power is
effectively broken the Tamil people will be
free to choose their leaders, and join the
democratic system. That is what we have
already begun doing with the development
programmes for the North.
As I said recently, we will be looking
towards a new Spring of Development in and
for the North. We will restore democracy and
ensure that the people there are treated
equally under the Constitution. Don’t forget
that almost all the democratically elected
leaders of the Tamil people, their trade
union leaders, teachers and intellectuals
were killed by the LTTE. I do not think that
there will be any need to wean away such
people from their oppressors.
Q: Gen Fonseka referred to some
politicians in Tamil Nadu as political
jokers who receive monetary help from the
LTTE. Do you share this view?
A: I was briefed that it was an
inadvertent report in a newspaper. I
understand that the Secretary, Ministry of
Defence, has expressed regret for whatever
had been reported, if it was as stated. I
also learn that the management of the
newspaper has removed the editor concerned,
for lack of editorial discretion.
Whatever had been reported inadvertently is
not the view of the government, and I
believe the matter rests there.
Q: Do you as the President of a
country fighting terrorism believe that
Pakistan has a responsibility to curb
terrorist activities from any part of the
territory that it controls and that India
has the same right to self-defence that you
exercise in your fight against terrorism?
A: Terrorism is an international
phenomenon and it has to be curbed
collectively. Sri Lanka as the present Chair
of the SAARC would like to reiterate our
commitment to the declaration made in
Colombo recently on the need for the
strongest possible cooperation in the fight
against terrorism. Every country should be
free to defend itself against terrorism,
wherever it comes from, whatever its
manifestations, or whoever its leader.
|