|
Much of the fodder that the UN rights body
offered as its own diligently cross-checked
facts was the same self-serving pap the
Tamil Tiger propaganda machine is spewing
out on the Internet. As the record now
shows, much of the fodder that the UNHRC
offered up as its own supposedly diligent
“cross-checking of facts” was no more than
the same self-serving pap that (sensing the
end is nigh as it makes its last stand
cornered in a rapidly diminishing 21 square
kilometer patch of jungle) the now ignited
Tamil Tiger propaganda machine is spewing t
on the Internet, states the Manila Times of
March (30).
What is an undisputed fact is the
presence in the battlefield of several
thousand innocent civilians, including women
and children, held hostage there by the
Tigers as a barbarically convenient human
shield in order to secure a ceasefire and a
desperately needed respite.
The Manila Times “Open Notebook” states:
“meanwhile, unable to make a fight of it in
the theatre of war, the Tigers are now
dependent on their paymasters in the
misguided (and extortion ridden) Tamil
diaspora to do battle for them by taking to
the streets of London, Ottawa, and Geneva
and targeting the support of the local
populace in the faint hope that enough
voices will be mustered to force a UN or
European Union mandated ceasefire”.
Here is the text of the article:
Much of the fodder that the UN rights
body offered as its own diligently
cross-checked facts was the same
self-serving pap the Tamil Tiger propaganda
machine is spewing out on the Internet
ONE of the less appreciated side-effects for
anyone dispatched to the tropics on United
Nations related business is that the good
life which comes with the job—with a fair
share of it spent in the customary
expatriate ritual of subjecting one’s body
to the harsh rays of the sun while lazing by
azure-hued swimming pools or golden sandy
beaches—can result in the microwaving of the
brain cells.
Similarly, over in Geneva, which serves
as the capital of the UN’s humanitarian
soul, a posting to a spacious corner suite
of a chateau set amidst the picturesque
alpine ambience (with the cool and
invigorating air thrown in for free) must
tend to get the brain cells functioning at
the lower gauges of the thought meter.
This, perhaps, is the only plausible
reason we can offer up in mitigation for the
mind boggling (and diplomatically costly)
faux pas made by the United Nations Human
Rights Commission (UNHRC) through its
seemingly prickly boss Navaneetham Pillay.
Ensconced in salubrious Geneva and
gasping for the oxygen of publicity for a
body which has been severely discredited on
many fronts globally as being inept and
incompetent, Pillay claimed, rather wildly
as it now transpires, that more than 2,800
innocent civilians had been killed and a
further 7000 wounded in recent weeks in the
ongoing fighting between the Sri Lankan
forces and the Tamil Tigers—even though the
facts on the battle ground, and the evidence
from the hospitals that surround the battle
zone, could prove otherwise.
And this is where our aforementioned
theory that the agreeable weather in both
Colombo (where the alleged figures emanated)
and Geneva (whence they were disseminated by
UNHRC carrier pigeons) must at times make
rational thinking and attention to detail a
tough option.
Needless to say, the Sri Lankan
government is fiercely disputing the claims,
and rightly so. What the UNHRC appears to
have overlooked is the very salient fact
that Sri Lanka is not at war with itself—as
we discovered this past week while traveling
around this stunningly beautiful island
where smiles are very easily activated.
Sinhalese (who make up a sizeable majority),
Tamils, Muslims and a spattering of other
ethic groups live alongside each other in
perfect harmony. And the only time that
social equilibrium is shattered is when the
Tamil Tigers chose to do so with their
bombs, bullets and suicide belts.
As the record now shows, much of the
fodder that the UNHRC offered up as its own
supposedly diligent “cross-checking of
facts” was no more than the same
self-serving pap that (sensing the end is
nigh as it makes its last stand cornered in
a rapidly diminishing 21 square kilometer
patch of jungle) the now ignited Tamil Tiger
propaganda machine is spewing out on the
Internet.
What is an undisputed fact is the
presence in the battlefield of several
thousand innocent civilians, including women
and children, held hostage there by the
Tigers as a barbarically convenient human
shield in order to secure a ceasefire and a
desperately needed respite.
Meanwhile, unable to make a fight of it
in the theatre of war, the Tigers are now
dependent on their paymasters in the
misguided (and extortion ridden) Tamil
diaspora to do battle for them by taking to
the streets of London, Ottawa, and Geneva
and targeting the support of the local
populace in the faint hope that enough
voices will be mustered to force a UN or
European Union mandated ceasefire.
Elsewhere, the Web based Tiger surrogates
are also on fire. When we penned a recent
column stating that Vellupillai Prabhakaran,
the blood thirsty leader of the Liberation
Tigers of Tamil Elam (LTTE), believes that
the logic of survival was brutality, we were
swamped with over 300 emails refuting our
stand—one of which accused us of making the
commandant of the Tigers “look like a devil
when he is an angel!”
We will leave the LTTE apologists to
agonize over the competing prospects of
strumming a harp on a heavenly cloud, or
being deep-fried in a furnace in hell.
Suffice it to say, that with the battle
for a Tamil homeland, or Elam, now in near
ashes, the war takes on a new phase by
moving on to the media forum and cyberspace
to secure (gullible?) hearts and minds to
the cause on a universal theatre.
As of writing, Pillay—whose name, through
no fault of her own, would resonate more
comfortably in Southern India (where the
Tamil Tigers still retain a fast fading
support base) than Southern Sri Lanka—has
stubbornly refused to back down from her
stated case.
This despite the fact that the UN
headquarters in New York issued a communiqué
on the blistering controversy, which seemed
to mildly imply that the UNHRC figures are
at best questionable.
Elsewhere at the UN in recent days
influential voices have been raised against
the inhuman tactics of the Tigers in the
battleground. So at the Big Apple end at
least they don’t want to be seen as cozying
up to a terrorist outfit that is rotten to
the core.
But Pillay’s unyielding stand is hardly
surprising seeing as credibility (think
Gaza, Darfur, Bosnia, Somalia, Ethiopia,
Angola . . . need we go on?) is a commodity
that deserted the corridors of the UNHRC
decades ago
|