|
“Many Tamil spokesmen in Canada seem to live
in a dream world — ignoring the plain fact
that (as the United Nations and several
blue-chip NGOs have pointed out) a primary
threat to Tamils in Sri Lanka is posed by
the Tigers themselves, who are holding
trapped civilians as human shields”, said
the Canadian "National Post" in an editorial
comment (April 29).
The protesters seem curiously unperturbed
by the Tigers’ own brutality toward Tamils;
one is left to wonder what their real goal
is: saving Tamils, or saving the remaining
leadership of the Tigers. The editorial
asks.
As noted in previous editorials, we are
not unsympathetic with the protesters’
professed humanitarian concerns: Tens of
thousands of ethnic Tamils remain trapped —
alongside several hundred apparently
suicidal Tamil Tiger fighters — in a small
sliver of northeast Sri Lanka. But there is
a reason that most informed Canadians regard
the protesters more as a slightly sinister
annoyance than as noisy humanitarians: They
are caring flags designed by, and
glorifying, a banned terrorist organization,
it adds.
Text of the editorial
Torontonians rightly celebrate the
multicultural nature of their city. But such
sentiments were tested this week, as an
ongoing cycle of Tamil protests besieged
tens of thousands of workers in the city’s
downtown core, adding idle time to
core-bound commutes, and subjecting the
country’s most expensive labour to the
constant angry thrum of folk drumming. There
is a fine line between accommodating
spontaneous political action on behalf of a
legitimately concerned ethnic group seeking
to express solidarity with brethren overseas
— and letting one’s city be taken over by a
mob.
The protesters are demanding that Canada
take action against Sri Lanka’s government,
which is now in the final stages of a
military campaign against the Tamil Tigers,
a once-successful military insurgency that
often has resorted to terrorist tactics in
its bid to create an independent Tamil
homeland. As noted in previous editorials,
we are not unsympathetic with the
protesters’ professed humanitarian concerns:
Tens of thousands of ethnic Tamils remain
trapped — alongside several hundred
apparently suicidal Tamil Tiger fighters —
in a small sliver of northeast Sri Lanka.
But there is a reason that most informed
Canadians regard the protesters more as a
slightly sinister annoyance than as noisy
humanitarians: They are caring flags
designed by, and glorifying, a banned
terrorist organization.
Moreover, many Tamil spokesmen here in
Canada seem to live in a dream world —
ignoring the plain fact that (as the United
Nations and several blue-chip NGOs have
pointed out) a primary threat to Tamils in
Sri Lanka is posed by the Tigers themselves,
who are holding trapped civilians as human
shields. Given that the protesters seem
curiously unperturbed by the Tigers’ own
brutality toward Tamils, one is left to
wonder what their real goal is: saving
Tamils, or saving the remaining leadership
of the Tigers.
Moreover, whatever the manner in which
Tamils are treated in Sri Lanka, they are
not persecuted here in Canada. Just the
opposite: They have done notably well by our
refugee system, and until recently carried
heavy weight in Liberal ethno-politics.
Where they have failed is in establishing a
dedicated political outlet that is free from
links to terror — a fact that casts a dark
shadow over this week’s events: While
staging non-violent protest marches is well
within the Canadian political tradition,
convening a mob to praise an illegal
terrorist organization is not.
Indeed, this month’s protests raise
questions about whether Tiger-friendly
Tamil-Canadian ringleaders are committed
Canadians who are sincerely concerned with
the fate of their hyper-extended Tamil
family — or exiles who have been biding
their time on Canadian soil, waiting for the
Tigers to win the war and build Tamiltopia;
and who are now punishing their neighbors
for the imminent collapse of their dreams.
For all our impatience at being held up
on the streetcar, we know the question is
complicated, and we hope it is being asked
in Tamil circles. In Peter Kuitenbrouwer’s
report on the protests for yesterday’s Post,
he quoted a youth Tamil organizer as saying:“They ask us ‘Why are you blocking the
street?’ And we tell them, ‘Because we are
out of choices.’ ” In a way, that’s good
news: Before Stephen Harper banned the
Tigers in 2006, the “choices” for Canadian
Tamils have included raising money for
political assassinations and suicide
bombings. But in a way, it’s also bad news,
because supporting peaceful change in Sri
Lanka does not appear to be one of the
“choices” on this perceived menu.
Tamils in Canada could have spent recent
decades building alternatives to the Tigers,
yet they showed little interest when force
seemed to have some chance of succeeding.
Now that the tables have turned, and the Sri
Lankan army has the Tigers trapped, their
Canadian cheerleaders suddenly are left with
nothing to do but pound out a dirge on
Canadian streets, as uninterested Canadians
file past on their way to work. Perhaps
these protesters should have preached
against violence when that message would
have meant something.
|