President Mahinda Rajapaksa wisely ignored
international calls for a ceasefire as he
got closer to victory, including threats
from the Obama Administration to block $1.9
billion in International Monetary Fund aid
money, states the Wall Street Journal
commenting on the defeat of terrorism in Sri
Lanka.
The WSJ’s Op-ED piece of May 21 also states
Prabhakaran's apparent demise is the Sri
Lankan equivalent to killing Osama bin
Laden.
The WSJ describes the Sri Lankan defeat of
the LTTE as “a win that vindicates one of
the major lessons of September 11: Most of
the time, terrorists have to be defeated
militarily before political accommodation is
possible”.
“The war on terror scored a big victory
this weekend with the Sri Lankan army's
battlefield defeat of the terrorist
Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam. The event
ends one of the world's longest running
civil wars. It also vindicates one of the
major lessons of September 11: Most of the
time, terrorists have to be defeated
militarily before political accommodation is
possible”.
“Along the way Prabhakaran made extensive
use of suicide bombers including a teenage
girl who blew herself up to assassinate
former Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi in
1991 and relied heavily on child soldiers.
In the final months of the war he used Tamil
civilians as human shields. Sri Lanka's
conflict has claimed 70,000 lives by most
counts. It should have been clear early on
that government negotiation would go nowhere
with such a committed killer”, the WSJ adds.
Here is the text of the WSJ’s article
titled “Sri Lanka’s Victory”:
The war on terror scored a big victory this
weekend with the Sri Lankan army's
battlefield defeat of the terrorist
Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam. The event
ends one of the world's longest running
civil wars. It also vindicates one of the
major lessons of September 11: Most of the
time, terrorists have to be defeated
militarily before political accommodation is
possible.
President Mahinda Rajapaksa announced
yesterday that the army had routed the
Tigers from their last redoubt in the
island's Northern Province, killing Tiger
leader Velupillai Prabhakaran and several
hundred other top militant leaders too.
Prabhakaran's apparent demise is the Sri
Lankan equivalent to killing Osama bin
Laden. Now that the Tiger leadership has
been eliminated, it's much less likely the
cadres will continue a low-level terrorist
insurgency.
The story of how Sri Lanka got here is worth
recounting. The island's conflict had
political roots when it started in 1983.
After Sri Lanka's independence from Britain,
the ethnic Sinhalese majority pursued many
discriminatory policies against the Tamil
minority: a Sinhala-only language policy,
preferences for Sinhalese in university
admissions and government hiring, and the
exclusion of Tamils from the police, to name
a few.
But the war quickly became more about
Prabhakaran's determination to form an
independent Tamil state under the exclusive
control of his Marxist Tigers than about
those Tamil grievances. His troops spent the
early part of the war fighting and
eliminating competing Tamil militant groups
as often as they fought the government. The
Tigers also killed many moderate Tamil
politicians who would have been willing to
cooperate politically with Colombo.
Along the way Prabhakaran made extensive use
of suicide bombers -- including a teenage
girl who blew herself up to assassinate
former Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi in
1991 -- and relied heavily on child
soldiers. In the final months of the war he
used Tamil civilians as human shields. Sri
Lanka's conflict has claimed 70,000 lives by
most counts. It should have been clear early
on that government negotiation would go
nowhere with such a committed killer.
But successive governments engaged in talks
with the Tigers, and periodic government
ceasefires and negotiations gave the
terrorists opportunities to regroup. For
instance, the Tigers built an "Air Force" of
propeller-driven planes and used it to
attack government bases during the ceasefire
that technically was in effect from 2002 to
2008.
Mr. Rajapaksa, elected in 2005, finally put
an end to the "peace process" with
Prabhakaran and focused on winning the
military fight. In 2007, with the help of a
Tiger splinter group, the government subdued
the Eastern Province; the first elections
were held there last year. The fighting then
moved to the North. It has not been cheap or
easy. Military spending in the 2009 budget
is $1.7 billion, 5% of GDP and 20% of the
government's budget.
Colombo also learned lessons from its
earlier failures against the Tigers. The
military improved its training in
counterinsurgency tactics, and Colombo
invested the resources to enable the army to
hold territory it won. Moves by the United
States, Britain, Canada and other countries
to freeze Tiger fundraising among the Tamil
diaspora helped weaken the Tigers. Mr.
Rajapaksa wisely ignored international calls
for a ceasefire as he got closer to victory,
including threats from the Obama
Administration to block $1.9 billion in
International Monetary Fund aid money.
Serious problems remain. The government now
faces a potential humanitarian crisis in
housing, feeding and clothing the more than
200,000 Tamil civilians who have fled the
fighting. Over the longer term Colombo will
have to more fully address the political
grievances of moderate Tamils and ensure
that there are economic opportunities for
all Sri Lankans. After decades of socialism,
several rounds of liberalization have since
paved the way for 6% to 8% annual growth
even amid a civil war. But with the tourism,
garment and tea industries all suffering in
the global slowdown, Colombo must institute
more reforms, like tariff cuts, to spur
further growth.
As Colombo starts to grapple with those
post-conflict problems, everyone else can
take note: Thanks to a strategy of defeating
the insurgency, Sri Lanka is now in a
position to talk seriously about peace and
economic growth. When negotiating with
terrorists doesn't work, beating them does.
|