 |
Sri
Lanka's
26-year
civil
war
between
the
government
and the
LTTE
came to
a
dramatic
end in
May with
a
decisive
military
victory
and the
killing
of
Velupillai
Prabhakaran,
the
Tiger
leader.
President
Mahinda
Rajapaksa
is the
man who
tamed
the
Tigers.
President
Mahinda
Rajapaksa
categorically
rejected
allegations
about
the
violation
of human
rights
in civil
war
between
the
government
and the
LTTE. |
Sri
Lankan
President
Mahinda
Rajapaksa
during
the
interview
in
Colombo
With
TIME on
July 10 |
"I
reject
that
totally.
There
was no
violation
of human
rights.
There
were no
civilian
casualties.
If I did
that, it
wouldn't
have
taken 2½
years to
finish
the war.
I would
have
done it
in a few
hours.
These
are all
propaganda,
said
President Mahinda
Rajapaksa
in his
extensive
interview
with The
'Time'
on July
10.
The
President
spoke of
his
commitment
to
democracy
and said
that it
is not
possible
to
separate
areas on
an
ethnic
basis.
With the
provinces,
certainly
there
must be
powers,
where
local
matters
can be
handled
by them,
he
added.
Following
are some
extracts
from the
interview
with
President
Rajapaksa
published
in the
Time
magazine
of July
13.
TIME:
Prabhakaran
had
become
practically
a
mythical
figure
in Sri
Lanka.
What
went
through
your
mind
when you
heard he
had been
killed?
Rajapaksa:
Thank
the
Lord.
That was
a gift.
How did
he die?
We know
that he
was shot
— that's
all. I
was not
interested
in
finding
out how
he was
shot,
but
whoever
that was
deserved
some
credit.
The most
important
thing is
that
he's no
more. I
would
have
preferred
to bring
him here
and have
a chat
with
him. I
have
never
seen
this
man.
What
would
you have
asked
him? Why he
did all
these
mad
things.
[Laughs.]
What
else can
I ask
him?
You came
under
fairly
intense
pressure
from the
U.S. and
European
governments
to call
a
cease-fire
during
the
final
offensives
against
the
Tigers.
You
resisted
that
pressure,
and yet
these
are some
of your
biggest
trading
partners.
Are you
worried
about
jeopardizing
those
relationships?
I don't
think
they're
so
petty-minded.
They're
the
people
who
encouraged
us to
defeat
terrorism.
We
followed
what
[George
W.] Bush
said. We
accomplished
what he
wanted:
eliminate
terrorism.
They
must
give
credit
to us.
We
fought
their
war. We
showed
that you
can
defeat
terrorism.
Some
foreign
policy
analysts
saw the
last
stage of
the war
as a
test
case for
the idea
that the
international
community
has the
responsibility
to
protect
civilians
caught
in a
cross
fire.
They are
my
citizens.
I am
responsible
for
them. I
have to
protect
them and
get them
out. If
I allow
some
foreign
country
to come
and do
that,
they
would
have
killed
most of
the
people.
It is my
soldiers
who will
protect
my
citizens.
They are
my
people,
they are
my
voters
... The
international
community
must
help the
government
if a
government
is
elected
properly
by the
people.
What if
an
elected
government
is
acting
against
its own
people?
Are you
going to
punish
[all
the]
citizens
for that
or the
man who
is
responsible?
Take me.
Say that
I
violated
all
these
human
rights,
killed
people,
right?
Do you
punish
me,
Mahinda
Rajapaksa,
or the
innocent
people
of this
country
by
sanctions,
embargoes,
and
travel
advisories?
There
are ways
of
punishing
me if
you
want.
There,
now by
saying
that, I
will get
punished.
[Laughs.]
Many
people
feel
that the
way you
ended
the war
sets a
dangerous
precedent
— that
the cost
in terms
of human
rights,
in terms
of
civilian
casualties,
was too
high.
I reject
that
totally.
There
was no
violation
of human
rights.
There
were no
civilian
casualties.
If I did
that, it
wouldn't
have
taken 2½
years to
finish
the war.
I would
have
done it
in a few
hours.
These
are all
propaganda.
The U.N.
stands
by its
number:
7,000
civilian
casualties.
Seven
thousand?
No way.
In the
eastern
province,
zero
casualties.
I won't
say
there
are zero
casualties
in the
north.
The LTTE
shot
some of
them
when
they
tried to
escape.
There is
so much
that is
not
known.
Would
you be
willing
to have
a Truth
and
Reconciliation
Commission?
We must
find out
what has
happened.
The
thing
is, if
you
start
something,
I don't
want to
dig into
the
past.
Many
people
feel
that's
exactly
what Sri
Lanka
needs,
to talk
about
what
happened
in the
past.
There
must be
a way,
that it
must not
be felt
that
they
will be
punished
again.
Then you
will
have the
north
and the
south
fighting
each
other
again;
you
can't
have
that
again. I
don't
want to
dig into
the past
and open
up this
wound.
Sometimes
a wound
needs
airing
to heal.
That is
where
the West
is
different
from the
East.
What is
your
priority
now?
Over
300,000
people
are in
the IDP
[internally-displaced
persons]
centres.
The
whole
area is
mined.
We must
de-mine
the
whole
area,
give
basic
facilities,
water,
electricity,
roads,
and
resettle
them.
What is
your
time
frame?
We have
a
180-day
program.
That is
our
plan. In
180
days, we
want to
settle
most of
these
people.
What
would
you like
to
accomplish
before
the next
presidential
election
At least
50% must
be
released.
I would
say 60%.
Is that
a
promise?
It's not
a
promise,
it's a
target.
There is
a sense
of
relief
in the
country
now that
the war
is over,
but
there is
also
some
anxiety
among
Tamils
over
what
happens
next.
If you
ask the
IDPs,
they'll
say, We
want to
go back
to our
villages.
If you
ask
politicians,
they'll
say, We
want
this and
that.
But yes,
we need
to give
a
political
solution.
Do you
believe
in some
kind of
self-governance
for the
Tamils?
Don't
say
Tamils.
In this
country,
you
can't
give
separate
areas on
an
ethnic
basis,.
With the
provinces,
certainly
there
must be
powers,
where
local
matters
can be
handled
by them.
What if
the
people
in the
north
want a
model of
governance
that's
somewhat
different
from the
rest of
the
country?
That I
will not
allow.
The
whole
country
must
have a
system.
You
can't
have one
system
for the
north
and one
for the
east.
There
are
already
signs of
development
— new
roads,
new
bridges
— but
I've
also
heard
some
concern
that the
roads,
for
example,
instead
of
connecting
Tamil-majority
areas to
one
another,
are
connecting
the
Tamil-majority
east to
the [Sinhala-majority]
south,
making
it
easier
for
people
from the
south to
do
businesss
there,
to move
there.
Is there
some
kind of
effort
to
change
the
demography
of the
Tamil-majority
areas?
No, but
it's
happening
in
Colombo.
The
eastern-province
Muslims
have
come
here.
The
Tamils
have
come
here.
You ask
them,
why are
you
coming
here?
Can I
stop
them?
No. If
anybody
wants to
come and
live in
any part
of this
island,
it is
the
right of
a man.
The port
project
at
Hambantota
— that's
a
massive
new
Chinese
project.
It's a
Sri
Lankan
project.
China
helped
us. It's
a
commercial
loan.
Hambantota
is my
area,
and it
had been
neglected
for so
many
years.
It's my
duty, my
obligation
to
develop
that
area. We
must
develop
not only
Colombo,
but
other
districts
too.
What do
you
think
China's
strategic
interest
is in
this
port?
I asked
for it.
China
didn't
propose
it. It
was not
a
Chinese
proposal.
The
proposal
was from
us; they
gave
money.
If India
said,
Yes,
we'll
give you
a port,
I will
gladly
accept.
If
America
says, We
will
give a
fully
equipped
airport
— yes,
why not?
Unfortunately,
they are
not
offering
to us.
Is China
becoming
more
important
than
India as
Sri
Lanka's
ally?
I don't
see
that. We
are not
thinking
like
that.
India is
our
neighbor,
our
relation,
our
friend —
we have
a
special
relationship.
For a
small
country
like us,
for
development,
you need
money,
you need
assistance.
In this
world,
who can
afford
to give
us
money?
We can
go to
China.
We can
go to
Russia
or
Brazil.
Very few
countries
can
afford
to give.
Japan is
helping
us a
lot. Our
biggest
development
partner
is
Japan.
India is
helping
us.
The last
time I
came to
Sri
Lanka
was in
January
for the
funeral
of
assassinated
journalist
Lasantha
Wickrematunge.
The
posthumous
editorial
that his
newspaper
published
was a
very
emotional
piece.
It
addressed
you.
He was a
good
friend
of mine.
He had
informed
somebody
to
inform
me [that
he was
in
danger].
But
unfortunately,
I didn't
get that
message.
I would
have
told him
to go to
the
nearest
police
station.
No one
knows
what
happened.
He was
very
sure
that it
was the
government.
He
wouldn't
have
called
me if it
was a
government
thing
... I
hope we
will
know the
truth.
Otherwise,
I am
getting
blackguarded
and I am
getting
the
blame.
|