|
The Army
has
vehemently
rejected
allegations
in
British
press
reports
that
weapons
of
British
origin
had been
used
against
the LTTE
in the
Eelam
War IV.
'The
army had
not
acquired
armaments
from the
UK
during
the
fourth
phase of
the
conflict,'
said
Army
Commander
Gene.
Jagath
Jayasuriya
in an
interview
with The
Island
newspaper.
The
British
press on
Wednesday
(August
19)
reported
that
cross-party
Committees
of MPs
on Arms
Export
Control
called
for an
investigation
into
whether
weapons
supplied
by
Britain
were
used in
the Sri
Lankan
army
campaign.
Meeting
local
and
Colombo-based
Indian
press at
the
Armoured
Corps
Regimental
Headquarters,
the Army
Chief,
revealed
that the
West had
denied
ammunition
needed
for
sniper
weapons.
SLAF,
SLN,
too,
reject
British
claim
The
SLAF and
SLN,
too,
yesterday
dismissed
claims
that Sri
Lanka
had
received
a 'wide
variety
of
weapons'
from the
UK to
finish
off the
Tigers.
Authoritative
sources
said
that
statements
attributed
to
British
parliamentarians
were a
joke as
Sri
Lanka
had not
acquired
any
ships,
aircrafts,
armoured
fighting
vehicles,
armoured
personnel
carriers,
artillery
pieces,
mortars
or any
other
heavy or
light
equipment
over the
past
several
years.
Sources
said
that the
British
had even
declined
to
supply
ammunition
for 30
mm guns
mounted
on SLN's
Fast
Attack
Craft.
Responding
to
queries,
sources
said
that Sri
Lanka
took
delivery
of ten
30 mm
guns
from the
UK way
back in
1996
along
with
6,000
rounds
of
ammunition.
Although
the
British
had
delivered
2,000
more
rounds
of
ammunition
to Sri
Lanka
later,
they
turned
down
subsequent
requests
for the
same,
sources
said.
|