|
The
Government
has
welcomed
the
statement
by Prof.
Philip
Alston,
the UN
Special
Rapporteur
on
extra-judicial,
summary
or
arbitrary
executions,
following
the
governments
communications
challenging
the
authenticity
of the
Channel
4 video,
that it
“raises
several
issues
which
warrant
further
investigation
before
it could
reasonably
be
concluded
that the
video is
authentic”.
Prof.
Alston
was
among
those
who were
quick to
condemn
the
allegations
against
Sri
Lankan
Security
Forces
made
through
the
Channel
4
video9,
which
showed
the
alleged
“summary
executions”
of Tamil
civilians
by Sri
Lankan
Security
Forces
personnel,
and
demanded
an
immediate
international
probe on
the role
of the
Security
Forces.
In
addition
to the
government
challenging
the
authenticity
of the
video
based on
scientific
analysis,
it has
now been
found
that
this was
the work
of the
LTTE,
and that
the
video
was
originally
made in
Tamil,
and
later
dubbed
with
Sinhala
words,
to
damage
the
reputation
of the
Sri
Lankan
troops.
Here is
the text
of the
Government’s
response
to the
statement
on by
Prof.
Alston,
issued
by the
Ministry
of
Disaster
Management
& Human
Rights.
The
Government
of Sri
Lanka
welcomes
the
media
statement
issued
today
(17) by
Prof.
Philip
Alston,
Special
Rapporteur
on
extra-judicial,
summary
or
arbitrary
executions,
in which
he now
acknowledges
that the
report
which
was
shared
with him
by the
Government
leads
him to
the
conclusion
that
“the
views
expressed
do
indeed
raise
several
issues
which
warrant
further
investigation
before
it could
reasonably
be
concluded
that the
video is
authentic”.
The
Government
of Sri
|Lanka
also
welcomes
Prof.
Alston
acknowledgement
that the
government’s
investigation
has been
prompt.
The
government
regrets
however,
that
Prof.
Alston
has
characterized
the
professional
investigation
as not
independent
merely
because
the
experts
concerned
were Sri
Lankan.
Prof.
Alston
does not
appear
to have
carefully
perused
the
Government’s
Consolidated
Response
of 09
September
in which
a URL to
Mr Siri
Hewawitharana’s
experience
and
qualifications
was
included
on page
4.
Contrary
to Prof
Alton’s
assertion,
the
Minister
of
Disaster
Management
and
Human
Rights,
Mahinda
Samarasinghe,
contacted
Mr
Hewawitharana
on 05
September,
several
days
after
the
short
op-ed
opinion
piece in
The
Island
newspaper
appeared
and
requested
him to
provide
the
Minister
with a
more
detailed
analysis
of the
video in
the form
of a
short
report.
The said
report
was
received
on 06
September.
With
regard
to Dr De
Silva,
the sole
reason
for
Prof.
Alston’s
characterization
of his
analysis
as
partial
is that
he
appears
to have
been
consulted
by the
Government
of Sri
Lanka on
previous
occasions.
The
Government
is of
the view
that it
is quite
legitimate
to
consult
acknowledged
experts
from
autonomous
academic
institutions
and this
in no
way
makes
the
expert
part of
the
Government
nor does
it
render
the view
tainted
by bias.
Moreover,
the fact
that
Prof.
Alston
now
acknowledges
that the
video
needs
further
investigation
to prove
its
authenticity
is
sufficient
to
establish
that the
work of
the
experts
consulted
by the
government
of Sri
Lanka is
credible.
This
also
confirms
the
governments
concern
that
Prof.
Alston
was
unduly
hasty in
issuing
his
original
press
statement
concerning
the
contents
of the
video in
the
absence
of any
credible
material.
It would
be
pertinent
to note
that the
High
Commissioner
for
Human
Rights
welcomed
the Sri
Lankan
delegation’s
communication
that a
prompt
investigation
had been
carried
out into
this
matter.
She also
mentioned
that,
being a
lawyer
herself,
she had
thought
it fit
not to
make a
pronouncement
on this
issue
until
the
authenticity
of the
contents
of the
video in
question
was
established.
The
Government
is of
the view
that any
further
comment
on this
issue by
Prof.
Alston
should
only be
consequent
to the
receipt
of fresh
and
cogent
evidence
that
will
enable
him to
conclude
that the
video in
question
is
genuine.
|