|
Seven
months
after
Sri
Lanka 's
long and
bitter
civil
war was
brought
to an
end by a
withering
government
assault,
the
political
coalition
that
supported
the
Tamil
Tigers
has
thrown
its
support
behind
the
former
army
chief
who
crushed
them.
In an
ironic
twist to
the
presidential
election
campaign
being
fought
on the
island,
the
Tamil
National
Alliance
(TNA)
announced
yesterday
that it
was
supporting
General
Sarath
Fonseka
in his
bid to
defeat
President
Mahinda
Rajapaksa,
states
The
Independent,
UK today
(7th),
in an
article
by
Andrew
Buncombe.
The
article
states
that:
At a
press
conference
in the
capital,
Colombo
, the
leader
of the
TNA
parliamentary
group,
Rajavarothayam
Sambanthan,
said his
group
had
decided
to
support
Mr
Fonseka's
candidacy
to
prevent
another
victory
by Mr
Rajapaksa,
whose
poor
record
on human
rights
and law
and
order
made it
vital
that he
be
beaten.
"The
majority
[of
Tamils]
are of
the view
that the
only
meaningful
way in
which
the
desire
of
President
Mahinda
Rajapaksa
to seek
a
mandate
for a
further
term may
be
thwarted
is by
voting
for
joint
opposition
candidate
Sarath
Fonseka,"
he
said."Extrajudicial
killings
and
enforced
disappearances
have
been
common,
and the
worst
affected
are
Tamil
people.
Corruption
is
rampant,
and
consequently
the rule
of law
and good
governance
has
reached
the
nadir."
For
all its
apparent
irony,
the
TNA's
decision
to
support
the
controversial
general
in the
election
on 26
January
was not
entirely
unexpected.
Analysts
say that
many
voters
who may
instinctively
not wish
to back
the
former
army
chief
are
likely
to do so
as a
protest
vote
against
the
incumbent.
In
November,
Mr
Fonseka
announced
he was
stepping
down
from his
post as
head of
the
defence
staff
and soon
afterwards
it was
revealed
he had
reached
an
agreement
with the
opposition
coalition,
headed
by the
United
National
Party (UNP),
to stand
as its
candidate
against
Mr
Rajapaksa.
The
President
and the
general
had once
been
close
allies,
but in
the
aftermath
of the
military
operation
against
the
Liberation
Tigers
of Tamil
Eelam (LTTE),
the
military
man was
shifted
sideways,
prompting
claims
from Mr
Fonseka
that his
role in
the
victory
had not
been
sufficiently
recognised.
He
later
said
that he
was
moved
from his
position
as army
chief
because
the
President
and his
brother,
Gotabhaya
Rajapaksa,
believed
he was
plotting
a coup.
In an
interview
with a
Sri
Lankan
paper
published
last
month,
Mr
Fonseka
also
claimed
that the
President's
brother
had
given
orders
that all
the LTTE
leadership
be
killed,
even
though
some of
them
were
seeking
to
surrender
as
government
troops
marched
into
their
final
stronghold
last
May.
Perhaps
conscious
of a
possible
backlash,
he later
retracted
the
claim,
saying
he had
been
misquoted.
The
increasingly
heated
election
contest
has
split
the
support
of the
Sinhalese
Buddhist
establishment
but Mr
Fonseka
has
sought
to
position
himself
as
candidate
for
minorities
as well.
Having
previously
claimed
that
Tamils
should
not
receive
the same
rights
as the
Sinhalese
majority,
he has
increasingly
moderated
his
position
and
talked
of
equality,
human
rights
and
justice.
Over
the
weekend,
with the
campaign
gathering
pace,
the
former
general
toured
the
formerly
rebel-held
Jaffna
Peninsula
and said
he would
create
an
environment
that
encouraged
business,
relax
security
measures
and
return
land
seized
by the
military.
He
also
said he
would
release
hundreds
of Tamil
youths
held on
suspicion
of
having
links to
the
rebels
and
offer
amnesty
and
rehabilitation
to
hardcore
fighters.
Making
up 12
per cent
of the
population,
Tamils
represent
an
important
electoral
bloc and
the UNP
opposition
coalition
has been
seeking
to reach
out to
the TNA,
which
currently
holds 22
seats in
Sri
Lanka 's
225-member
parliament.
"If
the
Tamils
don't
support
Fonseka,
then
their
vote is
lost.
It's
more
like a
protest
vote
against
Rajapaksa
getting
back
into
power,"
said one
Colombo-based
analyst
who
asked
not to
be
identified.
"In
the 2005
election,
there
was a
boycott
by the
Tamils.
Had they
taken
part
then
Rajapaksa
would
not have
won."
At
yesterday's
press
conference,
Mr
Sambanthan
did not
comment
on Mr
Fonseka's
role in
the
alleged
abuse
that is
said to
have
taken
place
during
the
closing
stages
of the
war,
when the
UN
estimates
up to
10,000
Tamil
civilians
were
killed.
However,
he said
his
party
talked
with
both
candidates
about
issues
that
were of
importance
to
Tamils,
such as
the
resettlement
of some
300,000
civilians
displaced
by the
war, the
rehabilitation
of areas
destroyed
by the
fighting
and the
dismantling
of
so-called
high-security
zones in
Tamil
areas.
-
THE
INDEPENDENT
|